Compositions and methods for improving fracture conductivity in a subterranean well

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterranean formations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity of fractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flow therethrough. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a proppant matrix composition comprising at least a plurality of proppant particulates and at least a plurality of composite particles, the composite particles comprising a degradable material and a filler material.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This Application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No.10/608,291, entitled “Compositions and Methods for Improving ProppantPack Permeability in a Subterranean Well,” filed on Jun. 27, 2003.

BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterraneanformations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity offractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flowtherethrough.

Hydraulic fracturing is a technique for stimulating the production ofdesirable fluids from a subterranean formation. The technique normallyinvolves introducing a viscous liquid through a well bore into aformation at achosen rate and pressure to enhance and/or create afracture in a portion of the formation, and placing proppantparticulates in the resultant fracture to, inter alia, maintain thefracture in a propped condition when the pressure is released. Theresultant propped fracture provides a conductive channel in theformation for fluids to flow to the well bore.

The degree of stimulation afforded by the hydraulic fracturing treatmentis largely dependent on the conductivity and width of the proppedfracture. Thus, the productivity of the well in effect becomes afunction of fracture conductivity, which is commonly defined as proppantpermeability times fracture width. To enhance well productivity, it maybe beneficial to enhance fracture conductivity.

Oftentimes, to effectively prop open the fractures as well as preventproppant particulate flowback, the proppant particulates are caused orallowed to consolidate into proppant matrixes within the fractures. Oneconventional means of doing this is to use resin-coated proppantparticulates so that when the resin cures downhole, the proppantparticulates can consolidate to form a relatively stable proppant matrixwithin the fracture. Other methods also have been used to facilitate theconsolidation of the proppant particulates within the fractures.

Although consolidating the proppant particulates within a fracture mayhave some benefits, for example preventing proppant flowback, suchmethods may adversely affect the conductivity of the fracture. That is,some methods of consolidating proppant particulates themselves mayintroduce a barrier to the free flow of desirable fluids from thesubterranean formation to the well bore for subsequent production.Fracture conductivity may suffer as a result. This is undesirable asthis may affect overall well productivity.

To counteract this potential problem, many different techniques havebeen developed. One technique involves adding calcium carbonate or saltto the proppant matrix composition. When the proppant particulatesconsolidate, after a subsequent fluid is added to the well bore, thecalcium carbonate or salt is dissolved out of the matrix. At least oneproblem associated with this method is the incomplete removal of thecalcium carbonate or salt if not adequately contacted with thesubsequent fluid. Another method has been to add wax beads to theproppant matrix composition. Once incorporated into the consolidatedproppant particulates, the wax beads melt as a result of the temperatureof the formation. A problem with this method is that the wax mayre-solidify in the well, causing countless problems. Another method thathas been used is to add an oil-soluble resin to the proppant matrixcomposition; however, this method has not been successful because of,inter alia, nonuniform removal of the particles.

Another way to address fracture conductivity has been to use biggerproppant particulates. However, there are practical limits to the sizeof the proppant particulates that may be used. For instance, if theparticles used are too large, premature screenout at the perforationsand/or fractures during the proppant stage of fracturing treatment oftenoccurs as a large amount of proppant particulates is being injected intothe fractures. In addition, by using proppant particulates that are toolarge, the ability to control formation sand is lost as the formationsand or fines tend to invade or penetrate the large pore space of theproppant matrix during production of hydrocarbons, thus potentiallychoking the flow paths of the fluids.

SUMMARY

The present invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterraneanformations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity offractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flowtherethrough.

In one embodiment, the present invention provides a proppant matrixcomposition comprising at least a plurality of proppant particulates andat least a plurality of composite particles, the composite particlescomprising a degradable material and a filler material.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides a treatment fluidfor use in a subterranean application comprising a proppant matrixcomposition, the proppant matrix composition comprising at least aplurality of proppant particulates and at least a plurality of compositeparticles, the composite particles comprising a degradable material anda filler material.

In another embodiment, the present invention provides a proppant matrixhaving at least one void therein, the void resulting from thedegradation of a degradable material in a composite particle.

The objects, features and advantages of the present invention will bereadily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of thedescription of the preferred embodiments that follows.

DESCRIPTION

The present invention relates to enhancing fluid flow from subterraneanformations, and more particularly, to enhancing the conductivity offractures in a subterranean formation so as to enhance fluid flowtherethrough.

In preferred embodiments, the present invention provides compositionsand methods for enhancing subterranean well productivity by enhancingfracture conductivity. The compositions and methods of the presentinvention may be used to enhance the conductivity of proppant matrixeswithin fractures so that fluids from the subterranean formation may flowmore freely to the well bore. The compositions and methods may be usedwithout negatively affecting the ability of the proppant matrix toperform other desired functions within the fracture, e.g., propping thefracture open or providing some degree of sand control. The compositionsand methods also may be used to avoid the production of undesirableacids within the matrix that may result from the degradation ofdegradable materials within the matrix.

In the compositions and methods of this invention, a proppant matrixcomposition may be made to consolidate within a fracture to form aproppant matrix, e.g., a substantially stable proppant matrix. The term“proppant matrix,” as used herein, refers to a consolidation of proppantparticulates within a fracture that may be adjacent to a well bore in asubterranean formation. The mechanism by which the proppant matrixconsolidates within the fracture is not important and so any suitablemethod can be used in conjunction with the present invention, e.g.,through the use of curable resins, tackifying agents, and/or amechanical method such as interlocking proppant particulates. The use ofcurable resins may be preferred.

The proppant matrix compositions of the present invention compriseproppant particulates and at least one “composite particle,” at least aportion of which is capable of undergoing an irreversible degradationdownhole. The composite particles used in the methods and compositionsof this invention comprise, a degradable material and a filler material.As used herein, the term “particle” or “particles” refers to a particleor particles that may have a physical shape of platelets, shavings,fibers, flakes, ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets,tablets, or any other suitable shape. The composite particles generallyare more resistant to crushing forces within a fracture (as compared todegradable materials by themselves) and, therefore, may help support thefracture and maintain the integrity of the proppant matrix. Also, whenthe composite particle degrades from the proppant matrix, voids thathave a desirable degree of integrity are formed, at least in part due tothe high crush strength of the composite particles and the consolidationof the proppant matrix. Suitable degradable materials and fillermaterials will be discussed below. The proppant matrix compositions ofthe present invention also may comprise an acid reactive material. Eachelement of the proppant matrix compositions of this invention isdiscussed below.

The concentration of composite particles in the proppant matrixcompositions of this invention may range from about 0.1% to about 30%,based on the weight of the proppant particulates in a particularcomposition. A concentration of composite particles between about 1% andabout 5% by weight of the proppant particulates is preferred. At higherconcentrations, there may be a point of diminishing returns, but thiswill be dependent on the particular factors, e.g., temperature, stress,how much filler is in the composite particle, etc. Additionally, oneshould note that the relative amounts of the composite particles in theproppant matrix composition should not be such that when degraded, anundesirable percentage of voids result in the proppant matrix that couldpotentially make the proppant matrix ineffective in maintaining theintegrity of the fracture. One of ordinary skill in the art, with thebenefit of this disclosure, will recognize an optimum concentration ofcomposite particles that provides desirable values in terms of enhancedconductivity or permeability without undermining the stability of theproppant matrix itself.

Any proppant particulates suitable for use in subterranean applicationsare suitable for use in the compositions and methods of the presentinvention. For instance, natural sand, ground nut hulls, man-madeproppant particulates, bauxite, ceramics, polymeric particulatematerials, low-density proppant particulates, or the like are suitable.Ceramic proppant particulates, in certain embodiments, are preferredbecause of their strength. Natural sand is also a preferred material,especially when cost may be a concern. Note that the term “particulate”implies no particular shape or size of proppant particulates. Preferredparticulates should conform generally to API RP-56 and/or RP-60.Suitable sizes for such proppant particulates may range from 4 to 100U.S. mesh, but are preferably in the range of 10 to 60 U.S. mesh.

In some embodiments, the proppant particulates may be used inconjunction with a curable resin, e.g., the resin may be coated on theproppant particulates, such that the resin cures when downhole,resulting in a consolidation of the proppant particulates into aproppant matrix. If a resin is used, the proppant particulates caneither be pre-coated or coated on the fly with a suitable curable resin.Any type of curable resin that will allow the proppant particulates toconsolidate to form a proppant matrix is suitable for use in the presentinvention. Examples include, but are not limited to, epoxies, furans,phenolics, furfuryl aldehyde, furfuryl alcohol, or derivatives thereof,or a mixture thereof. If a curable resin is utilized, a better resultmay be achieved if the proppant particulates are coated with a suitablecurable resin prior to being mixed with the composite particles.

Additionally, suitable tackifying agents may be used as an alternativeto or in conjunction with curable resins. If used, the tackifying agentis preferably incorporated with the proppant particulates before it ismixed with the composite particles.

In some embodiments, it may be desirable to coat the proppantparticulates with a tackifying agent rather than a curable resin. Such atackifying agent is preferably incorporated with the proppantparticulates before they are mixed with the degradable material. Thetackifying agent, among other things, helps distribute the compositeparticle within the proppant matrix composition and helps keep it inplace within the proppant matrix. Using a tackifying agent as opposed toa curable resin may be particularly useful if the composite particlesused have a low density or specific gravity, or have a substantiallydifferent particle size than the proppant particulates. The use of atackifying agent may help to reduce or eliminate the negative effects ofsegregation between the proppant particulates and the degradablematerial. Often, the composite particles will exhibit a significantlydifferent density from the proppant particulates. In such cases, whenthe particulates are slurried into a carrier fluid to be sent to aportion of a subterranean formation, the composite particles mayseparate from the denser proppant particulates. Since the methods of thepresent invention preferably create a relatively uniform matrix ofproppant particulates mixed with degradable material, that separationmay cause the job to be less successful. The tacky nature of a chosentackifying agent may help the chosen composite particles to at leasttemporarily attach to the proppant particulates. By becoming soattached, the negative effects of segregation may be reduced oreliminated.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the tackifying agent iscoated onto the proppant particulates early in the proppant stage of thefracturing treatment. Then, resin-coated proppant particulates are usedduring the tail-in stage of the fracturing treatment. In anotherembodiment, the tackifying agent and the curable resin are coated on theproppant particulates intermittently.

Compositions suitable for use as tackifying agents in the presentinvention comprise any compound that, when in liquid form or in asolvent solution, will form a non-hardening coating upon a particulate.Some examples of suitable tackifying agents include non-aqueoustackifying agents, aqueous tackifying agents, and silyl modifiedpolyamides.

Suitable non-aqueous tackifying agents generally comprise polyamidesthat are liquids or in solution at the temperature of the subterraneanformation such that they are, by themselves, non-hardening whenintroduced into the subterranean formation. One suitable such tackifyingagent comprises a condensation reaction product comprised of a polyacidand a polyamine. Such commercial products include compounds such asmixtures of C36 dibasic acids containing some trimer and higheroligomers and also small amounts of monomer acids that are reacted withpolyamines. Other polyacids include trimer acids, synthetic acidsproduced from fatty acids, maleic anhydride, acrylic acid, and the like.Such acid compounds are commercially available from companies such asWitco Corporation, Union Camp, Chemtall, and Emery Industries. Thereaction products are available from, for example, ChampionTechnologies, Inc. and Witco Corporation. Additional compounds which maybe used as tackifying compounds include liquids and solutions of, forexample, polyesters, polycarbonates and polycarbamates, and naturalresins such as shellac and the like. Other suitable tackifying agentsare described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,048, issued to Weaver, et al., andU.S. Pat. No. 5,833,000, issued to Weaver, et al., the relevantdisclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.

Such non-aqueous tackifying agents may be either used such that theyform non-hardening coating or they may be combined with amultifunctional material capable of reacting with the tackifyingcompound to form a hardened coating. A “hardened coating,” as usedherein, means that the reaction of the tackifying compound with themultifunctional material will result in a substantially non-flowablereaction product that exhibits a higher compressive strength in aconsolidated agglomerate than the tackifying compound alone with theparticulates. In this instance, the tackifying agent may functionsimilarly to a hardenable resin. Multifunctional materials suitable foruse in the present invention include, but are not limited to, aldehydessuch as formaldehyde, dialdehydes such as glutaraldehyde, hemiacetals oraldehyde, releasing compounds, diacid halides, dihalides such asdichlorides and dibromides, polyacid anhydrides such as citric acid,epoxides, furfuraldehyde, glutaraldehyde or aldehyde condensates and thelike, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments of the presentinvention, the multifunctional material may be admixed with thetackifying compound in an amount of from about 0.01% to about 50% byweight of the tackifying compound to effect formation of the reactionproduct. In some preferred embodiments, the compound is present in anamount of from about 0.5% to about 1% by weight of the tackifyingcompound. Suitable multifunctional materials are described in U.S. Pat.No. 5,839,510, issued to Weaver, et al., the relevant disclosure ofwhich is herein incorporated by reference.

Another suitable group of tackifying agents is aqueous tackifyingagents; that is, tackifying agents that are soluble in aqueous fluids.Suitable aqueous tackifying agents are capable of forming at least apartial coating upon the surface of a particulate (such as proppantparticulates). Generally, suitable aqueous tackifying agents are notsignificantly tacky when placed onto a particulate, but are capable ofbeing “activated” (that is destabilized, coalesced and/or reacted) totransform the compound into a sticky, tackifying compound at a desirabletime. Such activation may occur before, during, or after the aqueoustackifying agent is placed in the subterranean formation. In someembodiments, a pretreatment may be first contacted with the surface of aparticulate to prepare it to be coated with an aqueous tackifying agent.Suitable aqueous tackifying agents are generally charged polymers thatcomprise compounds that, when in an aqueous solvent or solution, willform a non-hardening coating (by itself or with an activator) and, whenplaced on a particulate, will increase the continuous criticalresuspension velocity of the particulate when contacted by a stream ofwater. The aqueous tackifying agents enhance the grain-to-grain contactbetween the individual particulates within the formation (be theyproppant particulates, formation fines, or other particulates), helpingto bring about the consolidation of the particulates into a cohesive,flexible, and permeable mass.

Examples of aqueous tackifier compounds suitable for use in the presentinvention include, but are not limited to, acrylic acid polymers,acrylic acid ester polymers, acrylic acid derivative polymers, acrylicacid homopolymers, acrylic acid ester homopolymers (such as poly(methylacrylate), poly (butyl acrylate), and poly(2-ethylhexyl acrylate)),acrylic acid ester co-polymers, methacrylic acid derivative polymers,methacrylic acid homopolymers, methacrylic acid ester homopolymers (suchas poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(butyl methacrylate), andpoly(2-ethylhexyl methacrylate)), acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonatepolymers, acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate derivative polymers,acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate co-polymers, and acrylicacid/acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate co-polymers and combinationsthereof. These and other suitable aqueous tackifying agents aredescribed in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/864,061, filed on Jun. 9,2004, and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/864,618, filed on Jun. 9, 2004,the relevant disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.

Silyl-modified polyamide compounds suitable for use as a tackifyingagent in the present invention may be described as substantiallyself-hardening compositions that are capable of at least partiallyadhering to particulates in the unhardened state, and that are furthercapable of self-hardening themselves to a substantially non-tacky stateto which individual particulates such as formation fines will not adhereto, for example, in formation or proppant matrix pore throats. Suchsilyl-modified polyamides may be based, for example, on the reactionproduct of a silating compound with a polyamide or a mixture ofpolyamides. The polyamide or mixture of polyamides may be one or morepolyamide intermediate compounds obtained, for example, from thereaction of a polyacid (e.g., diacid or higher) with a polyamine (e.g.,diamine or higher) to form a polyamide polymer with the elimination ofwater. Other suitable silyl-modified polyamides and methods of makingsuch compounds are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,309, issued toMatherly, et al., the relevant disclosure of which is hereinincorporated by reference.

Where the proppant particulates are coated with a resin and/or atackifying agent, the matrix may consolidate and avoid migration of theproppant particulates. As a proppant matrix is formed within a fracture,the composite particles should be distributed within the proppantmatrix. In certain preferred embodiments, the distribution of thecomposite particles in the proppant matrix should be relatively uniform.In a preferred embodiment, the removal of the degradable material in thecomposite particles occurs after the proppant matrix has significantlydeveloped and become relatively stable to minimize shifting orrearrangement of proppant particulates within the matrix.

Suitable degradable materials in the composite particles used in theproppant matrix compositions of this invention should be capable ofundergoing an irreversible degradation downhole. The term“irreversible,” as used herein, means that the degradable materialshould not reform a solid or reconsolidate while downhole, e.g., thedegradable material should degrade in situ but should not recrystallizeor reconsolidate in situ after degradation. The term “degradation” or“degradable” refers to at least the partial decomposition of thedegradable material, and includes both homogeneous and heterogeneousforms of degradation. This degradation can be a result of, for example,a chemical or thermal reaction, or a reaction induced by radiation.

After the requisite time period dictated by the characteristics of theparticular degradable material utilized in the composite particles ofthis invention, voids are created in the proppant matrix. Additionally,this degradation may result in the production of an acid, e.g., toperform a desired function like breaking a filter cake (for example, afilter cake in or near the fracture), breaking a viscosified fluid, andcuring a resin in a fracture (for instance, resin coated on proppantparticulates or on the faces of a fracture). The filler used in thecomposite particles in the proppant matrix composition can enhanceeither effect, i.e., the creation of voids or the production of an acid.The filler also may enhance the mechanical properties of the compositeparticles, and may be selected so as to not impair the mechanicalproperties of the proppant matrix. The resultant voids enhance thepermeability of the matrix, which may result in, inter alia, enhancedfracture conductivity, which should lead to an enhancement in theproductivity of the well. Enhanced fracture conductivity generallyenhances well productivity as well productivity is a function of, interalia, fracture conductivity. In a preferred embodiment, the degradationof the degradable material takes place after the proppant particulatesconsolidate to form a matrix inside a fracture or in place to minimizeshifting or rearrangement of proppant particulates within the proppantmatrix.

Nonlimiting examples of degradable materials that may be used inconjunction with the composite particles and the proppant matrixcompositions and methods of the present invention include, but are notlimited to, degradable polymers. The differing molecular structures ofthe degradable materials that are suitable for the present inventiongive a wide range of possibilities regarding regulating the degradationrate of the degradable material. In choosing the appropriate degradablematerial, one should consider the degradation products that will result.For instance, some may form an acid upon degradation, and the presenceof the acid may be undesirable; others may form degradation productsthat would be insoluble, and these may be undesirable. Moreover, thesedegradation products should not adversely affect other operations orcomponents.

The degradability of a polymer depends at least in part on its backbonestructure. One of the more common structural characteristics is thepresence of hydrolyzable and/or oxidizable linkages in the backbone. Therates of degradation of, for example, polyesters, are dependent on thetype of repeat unit, composition, sequence, length, molecular geometry,molecular weight, morphology (e.g., crystallinity, size of spherulites,and orientation), hydrophilicity, surface area, and additives. Also, theenvironment to which the polymer is subjected may affect how the polymerdegrades, e.g., temperature, presence of moisture, oxygen,microorganisms, enzymes, pH, and the like. One of ordinary skill in theart, with the benefit of this disclosure, will be able to determine whatthe optimum polymer would be for a given application considering thecharacteristics of the polymer utilized and the environment to which itwill be subjected.

Suitable examples of polymers that may be used in accordance with thepresent invention include, but are not limited to, homopolymers, randomaliphatic polyester copolymers, block aliphatic polyester copolymers,star aliphatic polyester copolymers, or hyperbranched aliphaticpolyester copolymers. Such suitable polymers may be prepared bypolycondensation reactions, ring-opening polymerizations, free radicalpolymerizations, anionic polymerizations, carbocationic polymerizations,coordinative ring-opening polymerization for, such as, lactones, and anyother suitable process. Specific examples of suitable polymers includepolysaccharides such as dextran or cellulose; chitins; chitosans;proteins; aliphatic polyesters; poly(lactides); poly(glycolides);poly(ε-caprolactones); poly(hydroxy ester ethers);poly(hydroxybutyrates); polyanhydrides; polycarbonates;poly(orthoesters); poly(acetals); poly(acrylates); poly(alkylacrylates);poly(amino acids); poly(ethylene oxide); poly ether esters; polyesteramides; polyamides; polyphosphazenes; and copolymers or blends thereof.Other degradable polymers that are subject to hydrolytic degradationalso may be suitable. One guideline for choosing which compositeparticles to use in a particular application is what degradationproducts will result. Another guideline is the conditions surrounding aparticular application.

Of these suitable polymers, aliphatic polyesters are preferred. Of thesuitable aliphatic polyesters, polyesters of α or β hydroxy acids arepreferred. Poly(lactide) is most preferred. Poly(lactide) is synthesizedeither from lactic acid by a condensation reaction or more commonly byring-opening polymerization of cyclic lactide monomer. The lactidemonomer exists generally in three different forms: two stereoisomers L-and D-lactide; and D,L-lactide (meso-lactide). The chirality of thelactide units provides a means to adjust, inter alia, degradation rates,as well as the physical and mechanical properties after the lactide ispolymerized. Poly(L-lactide), for instance, is a semicrystalline polymerwith a relatively slow hydrolysis rate. This could be desirable inapplications of the present invention where slow degradation of thedegradable material is desired. Poly(D,L-lactide) is an amorphouspolymer with a much faster hydrolysis rate. This may be suitable forother applications of the methods and compositions of the presentinvention. The stereoisomers of lactic acid may be used individually orcombined for use in the compositions and methods of the presentinvention. Additionally, they may be copolymerized with, for example,glycolide or other monomers like ε-caprolactone, 1,5-dioxepan-2-one,trimethylene carbonate, or other suitable monomers to obtain polymerswith different properties or degradation times. Additionally, the lacticacid stereoisomers can be modified by blending high and low molecularweight polylactide or by blending polylactide with other aliphaticpolyesters. For example, the degradation rate of polylactic acid may beaffected by blending, for example, high and low molecular weightpolylactides; mixtures of polylactide and lactide monomer; or byblending polylactide with other aliphatic polyesters.

The physical properties of degradable polymers may depend on severalfactors such as the composition of the repeat units, flexibility of thechain, presence of polar groups, molecular mass, degree of branching,crystallinity, orientation, etc. For example, short chain branchesreduce the degree of crystallinity of polymers while long chain brancheslower the melt viscosity and impart, inter alia, extensional viscositywith tension-stiffening behavior. The properties of the materialutilized can be further tailored by blending, and copolymerizing it withanother polymer, or by a change in the macromolecular architecture(e.g., hyper-branched polymers, star-shaped, or dendrimers, etc.). Theproperties of any such suitable degradable polymers (such ashydrophilicity, rate of biodegration, etc.) can be tailored byintroducing functional groups along the polymer chains. One of ordinaryskill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will be able todetermine the appropriate functional groups to introduce to the polymerchains to achieve the desired effect.

Also, we have found that a preferable result is achieved if thedegradable material degrades slowly over time as opposed toinstantaneously. Even more preferable results have been obtained whenthe degradable material does not begin to degrade until after theproppant matrix has developed some compressive strength. The slowdegradation of the degradable material, inter alia, helps to maintainthe stability of the proppant matrix.

The filler material chosen for the composite particles of thisinvention, inter alia, may enhance the mechanical properties of thecomposite particles (e.g., to enhance the crush strength of thecomposite particles), or may react with any degradation products thatresult from the degradation of the degradable material. In certainembodiments, the filler material may comprise from about 0.5% to about60% of the composition of a composite particle. In preferredembodiments, the filler will comprise about 10% to about 40% of thecomposition of a composite particle. Also, the filler material mayimprove the modulus between the T_(g) (the glass transition temperature)and the melting point of the degradable material. In other embodiments,the filler material chosen can interact with the degradation productsproduced when the degradable material degrades. Examples of such fillermaterials include anhydrous salts (see below), glass, talc, calciumcarbonate, mica, magnesium oxide, mineral filler, barite, silica,materials that may be used as conventional bridging agents, derivativesthereof, and combinations thereof. For instance, if the degradationproducts include an acid, the filler may neutralize or enhance thatacid. An example of a filler material that could neutralize the acidincludes a base; an example of a filler material that could enhance theacid includes another complimentary acid. In still other embodiments,the filler material may release a second chemical. For instance, thefiller material may comprise ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (“EDTA”),an oxidizer, a breaker, sodium persulfate, or magnesium peroxide. Insuch embodiments the filler material should not negatively impact thedegradable material; preferably, the filler material and the degradablematerial should compliment one another.

Examples of preferred nonreactive filler materials include anhydroussalts. An anhydrous salt is suitable for use in the present invention ifit will degrade over time as it hydrates. For example, a particulatesolid anhydrous borate material that degrades over time may be suitable.Specific examples of particulate solid anhydrous borate materials thatmay be used include, but are not limited to, anhydrous sodiumtetraborate (also known as anhydrous borax), and anhydrous boric acid.These anhydrous borate materials are only slightly soluble in water.However, with time and heat in a subterranean environment, the anhydrousborate materials react with the surrounding aqueous fluid and may becomehydrated. The resulting hydrated borate materials are highly soluble inwater as compared to anhydrous borate materials and as a result degradein the aqueous fluid. In some instances, the total time required for theanhydrous borate materials to degrade in an aqueous fluid is in therange of from about 8 hours to about 72 hours depending upon thetemperature of the subterranean zone in which they are placed. Otherexamples include organic or inorganic salts like sodium acetatetrihydrate.

Optionally, the composite particles of the present invention maycomprise additional additives such as processing aids, lubricants,antistats, antiblock agents, pigments, derivatives thereof, orcombinations thereof.

The composite particles used in conjunction with the present inventioncan be prepared by any suitable process for example, by bringing thecomponents in solid form and dry-blending using conventional means suchas a barrel mixer, a tumble mixer, and the like, followed by fluxing ormelting in an appropriate apparatus, such as a Banbury type internalmixer, rubber mill, single or twin screw extruder or compounder, or thelike. Preferably, the two components are brought together and processedin an appropriate melt extruder, from which the blend is extruded in theform of strands, which are pelletized for fabrication purposes. Othersuitable techniques well known to those skilled in the art can be usedas well.

If the application in which the composite particles will be used doesnot contain a component that will enable the degradable material todegrade, e.g., in a dry gas hole, then in alternative embodiments of thepresent invention, the degradable material can be mixed with aninorganic or organic compound in addition to or as a filler material. Inpreferred alternative embodiments, the inorganic or organic compound inthe composite is hydrated. Examples of the hydrated organic or inorganicsolid compounds that can be utilized include, but are not limited to,hydrates of organic acids or their salts such as sodium acetatetrihydrate, L-tartaric acid disodium salt dihydrate, sodium citratedihydrate, hydrates of inorganic acids or their salts such as sodiumtetraborate decahydrate, sodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate, sodiumphosphate dodecahydrate, amylose, starch-based hydrophilic polymers, andcellulose-based hydrophilic polymers. Of these, sodium acetatetrihydrate is preferred. Additionally, if the degradable material issusceptible to hydrolysis, it is preferred that a sufficient amount ofwater is produced to effect hydrolytic degradation of the degradablematerial. The degradable material is then in a sense self-degradable, inthat the degradable material should at least partially degrade in thereleasable water provided by the hydrated organic or inorganic compoundwhich dehydrates over time when heated in the subterranean zone.

The specific features of the composite particles may be chosen ormodified to provide the proppant matrix with optimum conductivity whilemaintaining its desirable filtering capability. Preferably, thecomposite particles are selected to have a size and shape similar to thesize and shape of the proppant particulates to help maintain substantialuniformity within the mixture. It is preferable if the proppantparticulates and the composite particles do not segregate within theproppant matrix composition. Whichever composite particles are utilized,the composite particles may have any shape, depending on the desiredcharacteristics of the resultant voids in the proppant matrix including,but not limited to, particles having the physical shape of platelets,shavings, flakes, ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets,tablets, or any other physical shape. The physical shape of thecomposite particles should be chosen so as to enhance the desired shapeand relative composition of the resultant voids within the proppantmatrix. For example, a rod-like particle shape may be suitable inapplications wherein channel-like voids in the proppant matrix aredesired. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of thisdisclosure will recognize the specific degradable material and thepreferred size and shape for a given application.

Additional materials may be incorporated in the proppant matrix, ifdesired, including, but not limited to, acid-reactive materials. Suchacid-reactive materials in the proppant matrix compositions may compriseany material that reacts with an acid so that the acid is at leastpartially neutralized. Suitable examples include, but are not limitedto, materials such as calcium carbonate, magnesium oxide, and calciumhydroxide. The acid-reactive material may react with the degradationproducts of the degradable material. This may be beneficial when thedegradation products comprise an undesirable acid. When included in aproppant matrix composition, the acid-reactive material should beincluded in an amount sufficient to control the pH of any fluid in theproppant matrix and/or neutralize any acid present. Considerations thatmay be taken into account when considering the type and amount ofacid-soluble component to include are, among others, the solubility ofthe reaction products, corrosion of any metals, and the control of scaleformation.

An inert filler may be included in the proppant matrix compositions.Suitable inert fillers are materials that, inter alia, enhance thecompressive strength of a proppant matrix. Suitable fillers include, butare not limited to, calcium carbonate, talc, mica, glass, silica, silicaflour, or other similar mineral fillers.

The proppant matrix composition can either be pre-blended and thentransported to the drill site, or it can be prepared on the fly at thedrill site and then introduced downhole within a relatively short periodof time. The term drill site, as used herein, refers to the workplace atthe site of a drill hole. Preferably, the proppant particulates and thecomposite particles should be mixed so as to form a mixture in afracturing treatment fluid. Any conventional fracturing treatment fluidmay be used in accordance with the present invention.

The concentration of the composite particles in the proppant matrixcomposition ranges from about 0.1% to about 30%, based on the weight ofthe proppant particulates in the mixture. In certain preferredembodiments of the proppant matrix compositions of the presentinvention, the composite particles make up about 1% to about 5% of theproppant matrix composition. Additionally, the relative amounts in theproppant matrix composition should not be such that when degraded, anundesirable percentage of voids results in the proppant matrix makingthe proppant matrix potentially ineffective in maintaining the integrityof the fracture. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit ofthis disclosure will recognize an optimum concentration of compositeparticles that provides desirable values in terms of enhancedconductivity or permeability without undermining the stability of theproppant matrix itself.

Thus, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects andattain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those which areinherent therein. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled inthe art, such changes are encompassed within the spirit and scope ofthis invention as defined by the appended claims.

1. A proppant matrix composition comprising at least a plurality ofproppant particulates and at least a plurality of composite particles,the composite particles comprising a degradable material and a fillermaterial.
 2. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least a portion ofthe proppant particulates comprises at least one of the following:interlocking proppant particulates, or proppant particulates coated witha curable resin and/or a tackifying agent.
 3. The composition of claim 1wherein at least a portion of the proppant particulates comprise atleast one of the following: natural sand, a ground nut hull, a man-madeproppant particulate, bauxite, a ceramic, a polymeric particulate, or alow density particulate.
 4. The composition of claim 1 wherein at leastone of the composite particles has a physical shape of a platelet,shaving, fiber, flake, ribbon, rod, strip, spheroid, toroid, pellet, ortablet.
 5. The composition of claim 1 wherein the proppant matrixcomposition comprises at least one of the following: an acid reactivematerial or an inert filler.
 6. The composition of claim 1 wherein thedegradable material is capable of undergoing an irreversible degradationdownhole.
 7. The composition of claim 1 wherein the composite particlesare present in an amount of from about 0.1% to about 30% based on theweight of the proppant particulates in the proppant matrix composition.8. The composition of claim 1 wherein the degradable material comprisesa degradable polymer.
 9. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least oneof the composite particles comprises at least one of the following: apolysaccharide; a chitin; a chitosan; a protein; an aliphatic polyester;a poly(lactide); a poly(glycolide); a poly(ε-caprolactone); apoly(hydroxy ester ether); a poly(hydroxybutyrate); a polyanhydride; apolycarbonate; a poly(orthoester); a poly(acetal); a poly(acrylate); apoly(alkylacrylate); a poly(amino acid); a poly(ethylene oxide); a polyether ester; a polyester amide; a polyamide; a polyphosphazene; or acopolymer or blend thereof.
 10. The composition of claim 1 wherein thefiller comprises at least one of the following: an anhydrous salt,glass, talc, calcium carbonate, mica, magnesium oxide, miheral filler,barite, silica, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, an oxidizer, a breaker,sodium persulfate, magnesium peroxide, an inorganic compound, an organiccompound, or a derivative thereof.
 11. The composition of claim 1wherein the filler comprises from about 0.5% to about 60% of one of thecomposite particles.
 12. The composition of claim 1 wherein at least oneof the composite particles comprises at least one of the following: aprocessing aid, a lubricant, an antistat, an antiblock agent, a pigment,or a derivative thereof.
 13. The composition of claim 1 wherein at leastone of the composite particles is formed by a melt extrusion process.14. A treatment fluid for use in a subterranean application comprising aproppant matrix composition, the proppant matrix composition comprisingat least a plurality of proppant particulates and at least a pluralityof composite particles, the composite particles comprising a degradablematerial and a filler material.
 15. The treatment fluid of claim 13wherein the treatment fluid is formed at a drill site.
 16. The treatmentfluid of claim 13 wherein the degradable material comprises at least oneof the following: a polysaccharide, a chitin, a chitosan, a protein, analiphatic polyester, a poly(lactide), a poly(glycolide), apoly(ε-caprolactone), a poly(hydroxybutyrate), a polyanhydride, analiphatic polycarbonate, an aromatic polycarbonate, a poly(orthoester),a poly(acetal), a poly(acrylate), a poly(alkylacrylate), a poly(aminoacid), a poly(ethylene oxide), or a polyphosphazene.
 17. The treatmentfluid of claim 13 wherein the degradable material produces an acid upondegradation.
 18. A proppant matrix having at least one void therein, thevoid resulting from the degradation of a degradable material in acomposite particle.
 19. The proppant matrix of claim 18 wherein thedegradable material did not completely degrade until the proppant matrixdeveloped some compressive strength.
 20. The proppant matrix of claim 18wherein the degradable material comprises at least one of the following:a polysaccharide, a chitin, a chitosan, a protein, an aliphaticpolyester, a poly(lactide), a poly(glycolide), a poly(ε-caprolactone), apoly(hydroxybutyrate), a polyanhydride, an aliphatic polycarbonate, anaromatic polycarbonate, a poly(orthoester), a poly(acetal), apoly(acrylate), a poly(alkylacrylate), a poly(amino acid), apoly(ethylene oxide), or a polyphosphazene.